<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firms Trying to Have, Eat Cake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawshucks.com/2009/01/firms-trying-to-have-eat-cake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/01/firms-trying-to-have-eat-cake/</link>
	<description>A self-deprecating look at life in and after BigLaw</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:03:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lawshucks</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/01/firms-trying-to-have-eat-cake/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>lawshucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=492#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Definitely not.  Proskauer and White &amp; Case are among those who also allegedly did it (by first years, we&#039;re talking about class of 2008s)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely not.  Proskauer and White &amp; Case are among those who also allegedly did it (by first years, we&#8217;re talking about class of 2008s)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tillie Glockenspiel</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/01/firms-trying-to-have-eat-cake/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Tillie Glockenspiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=492#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Was Gunderson Dettmer the only firm to lay off first years? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was Gunderson Dettmer the only firm to lay off first years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawshucks</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/01/firms-trying-to-have-eat-cake/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>lawshucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=492#comment-91</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know Dunham personally, but yes, he&#039;s still there.  He does IP litigation, so if you don&#039;t like working with him and you&#039;re otherwise qualified to do that stuff, that&#039;s one of the few areas where there&#039;s still plenty of firms staffing up. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t know Dunham personally, but yes, he&#039;s still there.  He does IP litigation, so if you don&#039;t like working with him and you&#039;re otherwise qualified to do that stuff, that&#039;s one of the few areas where there&#039;s still plenty of firms staffing up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Chic</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/01/firms-trying-to-have-eat-cake/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Chic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=492#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Is Tom Dunham still there?  If he is they may avoid the layoffs and just assign people to work with him -- they will be sure to volunteer to quit. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Tom Dunham still there?  If he is they may avoid the layoffs and just assign people to work with him &#8212; they will be sure to volunteer to quit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawshucks</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/01/firms-trying-to-have-eat-cake/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>lawshucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=492#comment-73</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;ve got stuff we can verify on the stealth layoffs, let us know and we&#039;ll investigate.  All we&#039;ve got confirmed so far is the 10 from December.  tips (at) lawshucks dot com </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#039;ve got stuff we can verify on the stealth layoffs, let us know and we&#039;ll investigate.  All we&#039;ve got confirmed so far is the 10 from December.  tips (at) lawshucks dot com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HowreyStaffer</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/01/firms-trying-to-have-eat-cake/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>HowreyStaffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=492#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Howrey is imploding in upon itself due to poor upper management.  More than 40 partners were asked to leave, associates and staff are being picked off one by one so it doesn&#039;t look like layoffs and they are subleasing their empty office floors.  Very cold hearted place to work, not family friendly and you are asked to sacrifice your personal lifehealth, all for what? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howrey is imploding in upon itself due to poor upper management.  More than 40 partners were asked to leave, associates and staff are being picked off one by one so it doesn&#039;t look like layoffs and they are subleasing their empty office floors.  Very cold hearted place to work, not family friendly and you are asked to sacrifice your personal lifehealth, all for what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
