<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Client Problems for Quinn Emanuel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawshucks.com/2009/01/more-client-problems-for-quinn-emanuel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/01/more-client-problems-for-quinn-emanuel/</link>
	<description>A self-deprecating look at life in and after BigLaw</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:03:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frogger</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/01/more-client-problems-for-quinn-emanuel/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Frogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=643#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Good point LS - this is a great summary.  And firms are so desparate for fees these days, they&#039;re willing to compromise themselves on ethics/conflicts. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point LS &#8211; this is a great summary.  And firms are so desparate for fees these days, they&#039;re willing to compromise themselves on ethics/conflicts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawshucks</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/01/more-client-problems-for-quinn-emanuel/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>lawshucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=643#comment-96</guid>
		<description>No doubt.  Assuming a blended rate of even $400/hr, that&#039;s $2.4 million.  Even if they somehow got paid (under quantum meruit or some other theory), they&#039;d just end up reimbursing the client for the expense of bringing Latham &amp; Watkins up to speed. 
 
It also significantly impairs the value of the Feldman hire.  If this guy is so toxic that they&#039;re going to lose every matter on which WSGR worked (even if he claims he personally did nothing), he&#039;s probably costing the firm a lot more than he&#039;s worth. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt.  Assuming a blended rate of even $400/hr, that&#039;s $2.4 million.  Even if they somehow got paid (under quantum meruit or some other theory), they&#039;d just end up reimbursing the client for the expense of bringing Latham &amp; Watkins up to speed. </p>
<p>It also significantly impairs the value of the Feldman hire.  If this guy is so toxic that they&#039;re going to lose every matter on which WSGR worked (even if he claims he personally did nothing), he&#039;s probably costing the firm a lot more than he&#039;s worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/01/more-client-problems-for-quinn-emanuel/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=643#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Quinn is one tough cookie, and for them not to either figure out a way around this or deal with it up front means that heads are goign to role.  Who knows how many associates will lose their jobs because of this. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quinn is one tough cookie, and for them not to either figure out a way around this or deal with it up front means that heads are goign to role.  Who knows how many associates will lose their jobs because of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
