Skip to content


Hogan Denies Conflict from Representing Competitors

A few weeks ago, Prestige Brands filed a malpractice suit against Hogan & Hartson. Prestige “markets well-recognized, branded consumer products in over-the-counter healthcare, household cleaning and personal care categories.” (Think abandoned staples of the medicine closet and under the kitchen sink: Spic and Span, Comet, Chloraspetic, Prell, and so on. The company buys and reinvigorates neglected brands.)

The company claims Hogan partner Howard Holstein (URI BS ‘68, Georgetown JD ‘72) represented a company Prestige acquired through the FDA approval process for a mouthguard, then took a competitor’s product through the same process.

Prestige, in its complaint, says the firm concealed the conflict and used confidential information from its representation of Prestige, such as testing methods, specifications and manufacturing details, to help DenTek get its mouthguard onto store shelves “substantially earlier than what could otherwise be accomplished.”

This is actually the second go-round in the dispute (not counting numerous unrelated suits Prestige is bringing against competitors and former employees for using trade secrets). Defendant DenTek has already had one suit dismissed in January from New York Supreme Court for lack of jurisdiction. In the present action, in D.C. Superior Court, Hogan & Hartson is fighting back.

The firm, through its counsel Zuckerman Spaeder, is again seeking dismissal – This time for failure to state a claim.  Apparently, Holstein didn’t actually learn anything from doing the exact same work for Prestige.  Instead, the defense strategy looks to be blaming the former client’s financial losses on its own poor judgment.  Hogan’s filing says that:

“Prestige has filed a baseless suit against its former lawyers to compensate for Prestige’s own erroneous predictions regarding the state of the mouth guard market”

Classy.

Related posts:

  1. Boutique Building Book of BigLaw Defense Work
  2. Weil, Hogan Reportedly Advised on AIG Bonus Payouts
  3. More on AIG Bonus Counsel
  4. Quick Shucks – 7/15/09
  5. Google Getting Hit From All Sides

Posted in Suits.

Tagged with , , .

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.


0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.