<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on AIG Bonus Counsel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawshucks.com/2009/03/more-on-aig-bonus-counsel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/03/more-on-aig-bonus-counsel/</link>
	<description>A self-deprecating look at life in and after BigLaw</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:03:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AIGShucks</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/03/more-on-aig-bonus-counsel/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>AIGShucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=1236#comment-396</guid>
		<description>really good analysis, LS - why couldn&#039;t AIG go to these bonus individuals and say we&#039;re cutting it by 50% come sue us for the rest?  Maybe, just maybe, these bonus contracts had cost of recovery provisions in them - knowing that AIG is on the losing end of the argument - the individuals would also win (reasonable) legal fees.  However (especially based on the DeSantis op-ed piece in today&#039;s NYT), it is clear there a like-minded individuals at AIG who would have taken less without all the brouhaha </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really good analysis, LS &#8211; why couldn&#039;t AIG go to these bonus individuals and say we&#039;re cutting it by 50% come sue us for the rest?  Maybe, just maybe, these bonus contracts had cost of recovery provisions in them &#8211; knowing that AIG is on the losing end of the argument &#8211; the individuals would also win (reasonable) legal fees.  However (especially based on the DeSantis op-ed piece in today&#039;s NYT), it is clear there a like-minded individuals at AIG who would have taken less without all the brouhaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
