<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shearman Brokered Questionable Midway Deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawshucks.com/2009/03/shearman-brokered-questionable-midway-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/03/shearman-brokered-questionable-midway-deal/</link>
	<description>A self-deprecating look at life in and after BigLaw</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:03:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lawshucks</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/03/shearman-brokered-questionable-midway-deal/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>lawshucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=1140#comment-365</guid>
		<description>I never understood how Dow went without a financing out on that one.  S&amp;S should have &quot;noisily withdrawn&quot; on that issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never understood how Dow went without a financing out on that one.  S&amp;S should have &#8220;noisily withdrawn&#8221; on that issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/03/shearman-brokered-questionable-midway-deal/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=1140#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Awful, awful firm. It also represented Dow in the clusterfuck that was the Dow/Rohm &amp; Haas deal. I think possibly the Kuwaiti joint venture too. Can it do anything right? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awful, awful firm. It also represented Dow in the clusterfuck that was the Dow/Rohm &amp; Haas deal. I think possibly the Kuwaiti joint venture too. Can it do anything right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeneralShearman</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/03/shearman-brokered-questionable-midway-deal/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>GeneralShearman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=1140#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Has Shearman responded to this yet? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has Shearman responded to this yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onions</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/03/shearman-brokered-questionable-midway-deal/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Onions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=1140#comment-349</guid>
		<description> 
Finish him! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finish him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DogDo</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/03/shearman-brokered-questionable-midway-deal/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>DogDo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=1140#comment-348</guid>
		<description>wow the machinations are deep and endless.  Chalk up this cloak and dagger with Quinn Emanuel getting in hot by disclosing confidential info of its clients.  It all stinks! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow the machinations are deep and endless.  Chalk up this cloak and dagger with Quinn Emanuel getting in hot by disclosing confidential info of its clients.  It all stinks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
