WaMu, JPM, FDIC Brawling

by law shucks on March 25, 2009

Last week, Washington Mutual and its holding company WMI filed suit against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., basically claiming that the FDIC conspired with JP Morgan Chase in a panicked “fire-sale” liquidation of WaMu.  Read the complaint here.

WMI is suing for $13 billion, the amount it feels it would have gotten over the “blue-plate” price of $1.9 billion paid by JPM.  This wouldn’t be the first time the FDIC has looked foolish for cramming through a bad deal.  As LawHawk notes, the government tried to force a sale of Wachovia to Citibank for $2.2 billion, but Wells Fargo was willing to pay $15.1 billion.  WMI claims an orderly liquidation process would have resulted in far greater proceeds than the JPM deal.

The Daily Deal has summarized some interesting conspiracy theories, including the usual tactic of blaming the naked shorts, early and that JPM got more and earlier information than others participating in a sham bidding process.

After the jump, JPM fights back, and we identify the banks’ counsel.

JPM countersued in the US Bankruptcy Court in Delaware (where the WaMu bankruptcy is being handled); the WMI complaint against JPM was filed in DC Dist. Ct.  JPM “sued to ensure that it does not lose any of its interests in Washington Mutual’s banking operations, which it said it bought in good faith. It also wants to be reimbursed for various claims it might face over the purchase.”  A copy of the complaint, which includes the purchase agreement, is here. Careful, though, it’s 250 pages.

Weil Gotshal & Manges is representing WaMu and WMI.  David Berz (George Washington BA ’70, JD ’73), a DC environmental (?!?) lawyer and Adam Strochak (Vermont BA ’87, George Washington JD ’93), a DC bankruptcy, complex-commercial, and environmental litigator signed the complaint as local counsel.  The heavy lifting is more likely being done by the New Yorkers: Marcia Goldstein (Cornell BA ‘73, Cornell JD ‘75), chair of the Business, Finance & Restructuring department, and her bankruptcy colleagues Brian Rosen (Brandeis BA ’80, Suffolk JD ’83) and Michael F. Walsh (Hamilton BA ’72, San Diego JD ’77, NYU LLM ’79).

JP Morgan is using Adam Landis and Matthew McGuire of Landis Rath & Cobb as local Delaware counsel.  Sullivan & Cromwell let five people sign the complaint: New York litigators David Braff (Cleveland State BA ’80, Ohio State JD ’84), who is also managing partner of the firm’s litigation group, Bruce Clark (Holy Cross AB 67, Harvard JD ’70), and Stacey Friedman (UCLA BA ’91, Duke JD ’97), and LA litigators Robert Sacks (Harvard AB ’79, Texas JD ’82) and Hydee Feldstein (Swarthmore BA ’79, Columbia JD ’82).

Stay tuned, this is just getting interesting.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Plaintiffs Firm Benchslapped
  2. Quick Shucks – 5/25/10
  3. Sidley Gets Rare Microsoft Patent Suit

{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }

Law&Finance March 28, 2009 at 1:12 pm

The tickers you attached to this post are inaccurate. Washington Mutual Bank does not have a stock ticker. WAMUQ represents Washington Mutual Inc. the bank holding company which is currently traded at $.057. WMI ticker is actually Waste Management.

Reply

lawshucks March 28, 2009 at 5:12 pm

Thanks. We use a plugin from a company called wikinvest. I manually took the tickers out of the post and let them know.

Reply

Law&Finance March 28, 2009 at 5:12 pm

The tickers you attached to this post are inaccurate. Washington Mutual Bank does not have a stock ticker. WAMUQ represents Washington Mutual Inc. the bank holding company which is currently traded at $.057. WMI ticker is actually Waste Management.

Reply

lawshucks March 28, 2009 at 9:12 pm

Thanks. We use a plugin from a company called wikinvest. I manually took the tickers out of the post and let them know.

Reply

Mike Tapiawala March 28, 2009 at 1:56 pm

I just want to clarify the amount WMI (WAMUQ) is suing FDIC for. It should read "over 13 Billion and not just 13 Billion. However, your post is well written and to the point.

Reply

Mike Tapiawala March 28, 2009 at 5:56 pm

I just want to clarify the amount WMI (WAMUQ) is suing FDIC for. It should read "over 13 Billion and not just 13 Billion. However, your post is well written and to the point.

Reply

aStockInvestor March 28, 2009 at 6:47 pm

Or rather a minimum of $13B. There are damages included which could total as much as $130B.

Reply

aStockInvestor March 28, 2009 at 10:47 pm

Or rather a minimum of $13B. There are damages included which could total as much as $130B.

Reply

wldgrdnr April 1, 2009 at 2:50 am

There is so much that was wrong about the Washington Mutual seizure and fire sale, a blog is not enough to explain it all. A group of shareholders have put up a website, http://www.wamustory.com that is a comprehensive look at the facts, including government documents regarding the seizure. It is hard to be objective about this, but we sincerely tried to be…

Do check out http://www.wamustory.com or alternatively http://www.wamutruth.com

Thank you for doing a story that gave a glimpse of what is going on here, and being a bit fair. The media is generally allowing itself to be lemmings, saying whatever the FDIC et al say, without researching the facts. If you read all the facts about this seizure and fire sale, it will make you angry even if you are not a shareholder.

Reply

wldgrdnr April 1, 2009 at 2:50 am

WAMU execs were not angels, BUT the seizure was inappropriate, uncalled for, and perhaps even criminal…caused by Sheila Bairs fear of her FDIC fund, OTS and SEC incompetency as well, more than anything else. The fact that the auction seemed to have a pre-arranged winner does not help matters either.

I hope the government pursues this on an honest level. That this could happen in America is mind boggling…It makes me wonder if truth, justice and the American way still belong in the same sentance.

Reply

wldgrdnr April 1, 2009 at 6:50 am

There is so much that was wrong about the Washington Mutual seizure and fire sale, a blog is not enough to explain it all. A group of shareholders have put up a website, http://www.wamustory.com that is a comprehensive look at the facts, including government documents regarding the seizure. It is hard to be objective about this, but we sincerely tried to be…

Do check out http://www.wamustory.com or alternatively http://www.wamutruth.com

Thank you for doing a story that gave a glimpse of what is going on here, and being a bit fair. The media is generally allowing itself to be lemmings, saying whatever the FDIC et al say, without researching the facts. If you read all the facts about this seizure and fire sale, it will make you angry even if you are not a shareholder.

Reply

wldgrdnr April 1, 2009 at 6:50 am

WAMU execs were not angels, BUT the seizure was inappropriate, uncalled for, and perhaps even criminal…caused by Sheila Bairs fear of her FDIC fund, OTS and SEC incompetency as well, more than anything else. The fact that the auction seemed to have a pre-arranged winner does not help matters either.

I hope the government pursues this on an honest level. That this could happen in America is mind boggling…It makes me wonder if truth, justice and the American way still belong in the same sentance.

Reply

Watcher September 18, 2009 at 1:57 am

WAMUQ has now gone from .057 to .206, and when more people get wind of what has… and what is happening… this penny stock price will cease from moving upwards in increments of pennies… it will begin to move in increments of dollars.

Reply

Watcher September 18, 2009 at 5:57 am

WAMUQ has now gone from .057 to .206, and when more people get wind of what has… and what is happening… this penny stock price will cease from moving upwards in increments of pennies… it will begin to move in increments of dollars.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: