<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pang Charged</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawshucks.com/2009/04/pang-charged/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/04/pang-charged/</link>
	<description>A self-deprecating look at life in and after BigLaw</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:55:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lawshucks</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/04/pang-charged/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>lawshucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=1578#comment-543</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a deal lawyer and have never (as far as I know) violated the securities laws, so the issue hasn&#039;t come up, but all we said that he has been charged, which would seem to include being charged with violating the securities laws, not that it was a criminal action. 
 
The SEC filed a &quot;complaint for violation of the securities laws,&quot; which you can read here 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2009/comp21013.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2009/comp210...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
The relief they&#039;re seeking is all civil-esque, to your point.  Disgorgement, injunctions, civil penalties, etc. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m a deal lawyer and have never (as far as I know) violated the securities laws, so the issue hasn&#039;t come up, but all we said that he has been charged, which would seem to include being charged with violating the securities laws, not that it was a criminal action. </p>
<p>The SEC filed a &quot;complaint for violation of the securities laws,&quot; which you can read here<br />
<a href="http://sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2009/comp21013.pdf" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2009/comp210.." rel="nofollow">http://sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2009/comp210..</a>. </p>
<p>The relief they&#039;re seeking is all civil-esque, to your point.  Disgorgement, injunctions, civil penalties, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/04/pang-charged/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=1578#comment-540</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t the Department of Justice bring criminal actions against SEC Act violators? Where the SEC only brings civil enforcement actions? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#039;t the Department of Justice bring criminal actions against SEC Act violators? Where the SEC only brings civil enforcement actions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
