<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Week in Layoffs &#8211; 5/29/09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawshucks.com/2009/05/this-week-in-layoffs-52909/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/05/this-week-in-layoffs-52909/</link>
	<description>A self-deprecating look at life in and after BigLaw</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:23:43 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: neo</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/05/this-week-in-layoffs-52909/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 20:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=1852#comment-687</guid>
		<description>&#8220;Compression&#8221; was an issue several years back when the race to $160 began. The problem was the more-senior classes were getting disproportionately lower raises as incoming classes&#8217; bases went up. And now it&#8217;s back in spades at Sonnenschein. First years are taking a 10% cut, but senior associates are getting hit for 15%. So what was already too-close a gap between classes has narrowed even further. What makes the move even less comprehensible is the fact that most clients would prefer to pay a premium to have senior associates and partners do the work and avoid junior associates like the plague. So the firms are paying the least-desirable assets the most money? Only in BigLaw, friends. 
 
 
 
THIS IS VERY TELLING AND PRESCIENT COMMENT, LS - YOU&#039;RE RIGHT, COMPLETE AND UTTER STUPIDITY.  WHY VALUE THE WEAKEST ASSETS SO CLOSE TO THE STRONGEST ASSETS - CHANGE THE PARADIGM, BLOW UP THE MATRIX BIG LAW 
!!!!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&ldquo;Compression&rdquo; was an issue several years back when the race to $160 began. The problem was the more-senior classes were getting disproportionately lower raises as incoming classes&rsquo; bases went up. And now it&rsquo;s back in spades at Sonnenschein. First years are taking a 10% cut, but senior associates are getting hit for 15%. So what was already too-close a gap between classes has narrowed even further. What makes the move even less comprehensible is the fact that most clients would prefer to pay a premium to have senior associates and partners do the work and avoid junior associates like the plague. So the firms are paying the least-desirable assets the most money? Only in BigLaw, friends. </p>
<p>THIS IS VERY TELLING AND PRESCIENT COMMENT, LS &#8211; YOU&#039;RE RIGHT, COMPLETE AND UTTER STUPIDITY.  WHY VALUE THE WEAKEST ASSETS SO CLOSE TO THE STRONGEST ASSETS &#8211; CHANGE THE PARADIGM, BLOW UP THE MATRIX BIG LAW<br />
!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
