<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: W&amp;C Loses Objection, Creditors Outed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawshucks.com/2009/05/wc-loses-objection-creditors-outed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/05/wc-loses-objection-creditors-outed/</link>
	<description>Life in, and after, BigLaw</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:33:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WCAnonymouse</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/05/wc-loses-objection-creditors-outed/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>WCAnonymouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=1681#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Lauria is just making noise since W&amp;C has no other work and they are trying to keep W&amp;C afloat on the basis of this high profile engagement.  Once it fades away (hopefully today when the Supreme Court finally throws out Lauria&#039;s objection), W&amp;C will collapse. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lauria is just making noise since W&amp;C has no other work and they are trying to keep W&amp;C afloat on the basis of this high profile engagement.  Once it fades away (hopefully today when the Supreme Court finally throws out Lauria&#039;s objection), W&amp;C will collapse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WCAnonymouse</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/05/wc-loses-objection-creditors-outed/#comment-3400</link>
		<dc:creator>WCAnonymouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=1681#comment-3400</guid>
		<description>Lauria is just making noise since W&amp;C has no other work and they are trying to keep W&amp;C afloat on the basis of this high profile engagement.  Once it fades away (hopefully today when the Supreme Court finally throws out Lauria&#039;s objection), W&amp;C will collapse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lauria is just making noise since W&amp;C has no other work and they are trying to keep W&amp;C afloat on the basis of this high profile engagement.  Once it fades away (hopefully today when the Supreme Court finally throws out Lauria&#039;s objection), W&amp;C will collapse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/05/wc-loses-objection-creditors-outed/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 12:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=1681#comment-629</guid>
		<description>What the Obama Administration has done is borderline mafia tactics.  If a Republican president had publicly denounced a company trying to assert their contractual and constitutional rights, the media would have eaten them alive. Obama lied outright when he said the &quot;hedge funds&quot; were waiting for a taxpayer bailout.  JohnQ is just another Obamafied, liberal lawyer; someone who will never create a company, innovate an industry or provide meaningful jobs for anyone save more lawyers.  Most lawyers are a tax on society, which is why the overwhelmingly vote Democrat, along with the other least productive segments of the economy. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the Obama Administration has done is borderline mafia tactics.  If a Republican president had publicly denounced a company trying to assert their contractual and constitutional rights, the media would have eaten them alive. Obama lied outright when he said the &quot;hedge funds&quot; were waiting for a taxpayer bailout.  JohnQ is just another Obamafied, liberal lawyer; someone who will never create a company, innovate an industry or provide meaningful jobs for anyone save more lawyers.  Most lawyers are a tax on society, which is why the overwhelmingly vote Democrat, along with the other least productive segments of the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/05/wc-loses-objection-creditors-outed/#comment-3399</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 12:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=1681#comment-3399</guid>
		<description>What the Obama Administration has done is borderline mafia tactics.  If a Republican president had publicly denounced a company trying to assert their contractual and constitutional rights, the media would have eaten them alive. Obama lied outright when he said the &quot;hedge funds&quot; were waiting for a taxpayer bailout.  JohnQ is just another Obamafied, liberal lawyer; someone who will never create a company, innovate an industry or provide meaningful jobs for anyone save more lawyers.  Most lawyers are a tax on society, which is why the overwhelmingly vote Democrat, along with the other least productive segments of the economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the Obama Administration has done is borderline mafia tactics.  If a Republican president had publicly denounced a company trying to assert their contractual and constitutional rights, the media would have eaten them alive. Obama lied outright when he said the &quot;hedge funds&quot; were waiting for a taxpayer bailout.  JohnQ is just another Obamafied, liberal lawyer; someone who will never create a company, innovate an industry or provide meaningful jobs for anyone save more lawyers.  Most lawyers are a tax on society, which is why the overwhelmingly vote Democrat, along with the other least productive segments of the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnQPubic</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/05/wc-loses-objection-creditors-outed/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnQPubic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=1681#comment-607</guid>
		<description>Wait, let me get this straight Jane @3, are you saying he the value add of an impact litigator like Lauria is ZERO but good for society at large - how is a litigator who takes a stand/position that his clients publicly disclaim/disavow in major media forums good for society at large?  Look, I may or may not work in the Obama administration, but you should stick to your job in the copy room at FedEx/Kinkos before playing in the field of &quot;impact&quot; litigators. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, let me get this straight Jane @3, are you saying he the value add of an impact litigator like Lauria is ZERO but good for society at large &#8211; how is a litigator who takes a stand/position that his clients publicly disclaim/disavow in major media forums good for society at large?  Look, I may or may not work in the Obama administration, but you should stick to your job in the copy room at FedEx/Kinkos before playing in the field of &quot;impact&quot; litigators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnQPubic</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/05/wc-loses-objection-creditors-outed/#comment-3398</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnQPubic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=1681#comment-3398</guid>
		<description>Wait, let me get this straight Jane @3, are you saying he the value add of an impact litigator like Lauria is ZERO but good for society at large - how is a litigator who takes a stand/position that his clients publicly disclaim/disavow in major media forums good for society at large?  Look, I may or may not work in the Obama administration, but you should stick to your job in the copy room at FedEx/Kinkos before playing in the field of &quot;impact&quot; litigators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, let me get this straight Jane @3, are you saying he the value add of an impact litigator like Lauria is ZERO but good for society at large &#8211; how is a litigator who takes a stand/position that his clients publicly disclaim/disavow in major media forums good for society at large?  Look, I may or may not work in the Obama administration, but you should stick to your job in the copy room at FedEx/Kinkos before playing in the field of &quot;impact&quot; litigators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/05/wc-loses-objection-creditors-outed/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 14:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=1681#comment-606</guid>
		<description>&quot;JohnQPubic&quot; probably works in the Obama administration.  The &quot;value added&quot; is either (1) the same value-added for any &quot;impact&quot; litigator: non-existent or adverse for the client, but good for society at large, or (2) in future leverage against TARP administrators.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;JohnQPubic&quot; probably works in the Obama administration.  The &quot;value added&quot; is either (1) the same value-added for any &quot;impact&quot; litigator: non-existent or adverse for the client, but good for society at large, or (2) in future leverage against TARP administrators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/05/wc-loses-objection-creditors-outed/#comment-3397</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 14:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=1681#comment-3397</guid>
		<description>&quot;JohnQPubic&quot; probably works in the Obama administration.  The &quot;value added&quot; is either (1) the same value-added for any &quot;impact&quot; litigator: non-existent or adverse for the client, but good for society at large, or (2) in future leverage against TARP administrators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;JohnQPubic&quot; probably works in the Obama administration.  The &quot;value added&quot; is either (1) the same value-added for any &quot;impact&quot; litigator: non-existent or adverse for the client, but good for society at large, or (2) in future leverage against TARP administrators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnQPubic</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/05/wc-loses-objection-creditors-outed/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnQPubic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=1681#comment-579</guid>
		<description>In the end, Lauria is going to be one more guy that gets steamrolled - he should just shut his mouth and draft documents.  After all, he is well known in the industry as a well card with a big mouth - not sure where his value add is for his clients right now with all this attention on the LAWYER and NOT the deal. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the end, Lauria is going to be one more guy that gets steamrolled &#8211; he should just shut his mouth and draft documents.  After all, he is well known in the industry as a well card with a big mouth &#8211; not sure where his value add is for his clients right now with all this attention on the LAWYER and NOT the deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnQPubic</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/05/wc-loses-objection-creditors-outed/#comment-3396</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnQPubic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=1681#comment-3396</guid>
		<description>In the end, Lauria is going to be one more guy that gets steamrolled - he should just shut his mouth and draft documents.  After all, he is well known in the industry as a well card with a big mouth - not sure where his value add is for his clients right now with all this attention on the LAWYER and NOT the deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the end, Lauria is going to be one more guy that gets steamrolled &#8211; he should just shut his mouth and draft documents.  After all, he is well known in the industry as a well card with a big mouth &#8211; not sure where his value add is for his clients right now with all this attention on the LAWYER and NOT the deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
