<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Week in Layoffs &#8211; 7/31/09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawshucks.com/2009/07/this-week-in-layoffs-73109/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/07/this-week-in-layoffs-73109/</link>
	<description>A self-deprecating look at life in and after BigLaw</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:03:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BankruptcyBill.us &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bankruptcy Billables 8.5.09</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/07/this-week-in-layoffs-73109/#comment-1075</link>
		<dc:creator>BankruptcyBill.us &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bankruptcy Billables 8.5.09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2682#comment-1075</guid>
		<description>[...] This Week in Layoffs – 7/31/09 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This Week in Layoffs – 7/31/09 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayor of Kita City</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/07/this-week-in-layoffs-73109/#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayor of Kita City</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 20:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2682#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>Sure. It&#039;s the normal review year from July 1-June 30. They are aiming to get reviews back to us earlier than normal. September. It&#039;s usually mid-October. My guess is that if people are going to be fired, it will be in September after reviews come back.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure. It&#039;s the normal review year from July 1-June 30. They are aiming to get reviews back to us earlier than normal. September. It&#039;s usually mid-October. My guess is that if people are going to be fired, it will be in September after reviews come back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Realist</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/07/this-week-in-layoffs-73109/#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>Realist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2682#comment-1045</guid>
		<description>Cool. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawshucks</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/07/this-week-in-layoffs-73109/#comment-1044</link>
		<dc:creator>lawshucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 18:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2682#comment-1044</guid>
		<description>This whole thing was written in celebration of a week without layoffs, then we found that one at the list minute, so it had to be revised late.  We&#039;ll bring it back next week. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole thing was written in celebration of a week without layoffs, then we found that one at the list minute, so it had to be revised late.  We&#039;ll bring it back next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawshucks</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/07/this-week-in-layoffs-73109/#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>lawshucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 18:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2682#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s pretty much what we&#039;ve said all along, although with a healthy dose of skepticism about whether standards are being applied consistently, or if they&#039;re being tightened due to the economy.   
 
Is this normal time of year for reviews at Kirkland? 
 
Thanks for the feedback. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s pretty much what we&#039;ve said all along, although with a healthy dose of skepticism about whether standards are being applied consistently, or if they&#039;re being tightened due to the economy.   </p>
<p>Is this normal time of year for reviews at Kirkland? </p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insolvency On The Increase As Quarter Day Approaches &#124; Credit Card News</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/07/this-week-in-layoffs-73109/#comment-1041</link>
		<dc:creator>Insolvency On The Increase As Quarter Day Approaches &#124; Credit Card News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 16:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2682#comment-1041</guid>
		<description>[...] This Week in Layoffs – 7/31/09 &#124; Law Shucks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This Week in Layoffs – 7/31/09 | Law Shucks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Realist</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/07/this-week-in-layoffs-73109/#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator>Realist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2682#comment-1040</guid>
		<description>Where&#039;s the report on the overall economy (jobless claims, etc...)? I always enjoy that. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#039;s the report on the overall economy (jobless claims, etc&#8230;)? I always enjoy that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayor of Kita City</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/07/this-week-in-layoffs-73109/#comment-1039</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayor of Kita City</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 14:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2682#comment-1039</guid>
		<description>There is no layoff list like that at Kirkland. In most departments, there is a list of people each year the department expects to receive an overall Below-Class review once the reviews start rolling in. Usually, if someone does end getting such a rating, they get fired. This is true at Kirkland in the best economy. It will probably be true now. If it happens, it won&#039;t be a layoff. 
 
The only question is if people get false Below Class reviews this year and are fired in greater numbers. But there is no indication of that.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no layoff list like that at Kirkland. In most departments, there is a list of people each year the department expects to receive an overall Below-Class review once the reviews start rolling in. Usually, if someone does end getting such a rating, they get fired. This is true at Kirkland in the best economy. It will probably be true now. If it happens, it won&#039;t be a layoff. </p>
<p>The only question is if people get false Below Class reviews this year and are fired in greater numbers. But there is no indication of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
