<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Diving into the &#8220;End of BigLaw&#8221; Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/diving-into-the-end-of-biglaw-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/diving-into-the-end-of-biglaw-debate/</link>
	<description>A self-deprecating look at life in and after BigLaw</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:14:33 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Needle in the haystack &#171; BrightLeaf</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/diving-into-the-end-of-biglaw-debate/#comment-1100</link>
		<dc:creator>Needle in the haystack &#171; BrightLeaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2731#comment-1100</guid>
		<description>[...] A few skirmishes between Group #1 and Group [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A few skirmishes between Group #1 and Group [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawshucks</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/diving-into-the-end-of-biglaw-debate/#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator>lawshucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2731#comment-1074</guid>
		<description>I view that as being implied in management&#039;s duty to ensure that their firm IS the better deal (including the friction costs of moving).

Also, I know Goetz and allen left freshfields this year and whitey last year I&#039;ll fix it when I have better keyboard (on phone right now)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I view that as being implied in management&#8217;s duty to ensure that their firm IS the better deal (including the friction costs of moving).</p>
<p>Also, I know Goetz and allen left freshfields this year and whitey last year I&#8217;ll fix it when I have better keyboard (on phone right now)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Realist</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/diving-into-the-end-of-biglaw-debate/#comment-1073</link>
		<dc:creator>Realist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2731#comment-1073</guid>
		<description>Partners are not leaving firms because they are poorly managed, though they often are. They are leaving because they can get a better deal elsewhere. It&#039;s not true of everyone, but a majority and perhaps a large majority of people are going to jump ship if they have a book of business and can land somewhere that enables them to make another $500K a year. That&#039;s true even if they love the firm and think it&#039;s well-managed and suits their needs. Human nature. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Partners are not leaving firms because they are poorly managed, though they often are. They are leaving because they can get a better deal elsewhere. It&#039;s not true of everyone, but a majority and perhaps a large majority of people are going to jump ship if they have a book of business and can land somewhere that enables them to make another $500K a year. That&#039;s true even if they love the firm and think it&#039;s well-managed and suits their needs. Human nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
