<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Go-See</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/go-see/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/go-see/</link>
	<description>A self-deprecating look at life in and after BigLaw</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:03:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/go-see/#comment-1212</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2755#comment-1212</guid>
		<description>Why this massive BIGLaw obsession with illusion? It&#039;s not like any law firm has a good reputation - maybe a reputation for doing solid work, but not a reputation for being a good guy.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why this massive BIGLaw obsession with illusion? It&#039;s not like any law firm has a good reputation &#8211; maybe a reputation for doing solid work, but not a reputation for being a good guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/go-see/#comment-1105</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2755#comment-1105</guid>
		<description>Many fashion go-sees are legit. Apparently, some are not. But along with the fashion business, the advertising world has been holding bogus &quot;go-sees&quot; for years. Bored art directors and copywriters call in freelance sheep (unsuspecting photographers and commercial artists, or their agents) and string them along on projects that do not even exist. They will borrow the portfolios overnight (&quot;to show the client&quot;) and then make copies of the sheep&#039;s best work. Next thing you know, the sheep&#039;s portfolio samples are mocked up for client ads.  
 
Law firms are just late to this game.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many fashion go-sees are legit. Apparently, some are not. But along with the fashion business, the advertising world has been holding bogus &quot;go-sees&quot; for years. Bored art directors and copywriters call in freelance sheep (unsuspecting photographers and commercial artists, or their agents) and string them along on projects that do not even exist. They will borrow the portfolios overnight (&quot;to show the client&quot;) and then make copies of the sheep&#039;s best work. Next thing you know, the sheep&#039;s portfolio samples are mocked up for client ads.  </p>
<p>Law firms are just late to this game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/go-see/#comment-1081</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 21:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2755#comment-1081</guid>
		<description>I think they&#039;re really just trying to create the illusion that they&#039;re still somewhat healthy.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they&#039;re really just trying to create the illusion that they&#039;re still somewhat healthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
