<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revisiting the Candidates for Impending Layoffs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/revisiting-the-candidates-for-impending-layoffs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/revisiting-the-candidates-for-impending-layoffs/</link>
	<description>A self-deprecating look at life in and after BigLaw</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:03:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lawshucks</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/revisiting-the-candidates-for-impending-layoffs/#comment-1310</link>
		<dc:creator>lawshucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2825#comment-1310</guid>
		<description>OK, let&#039;s see if you&#039;re right.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, let&#039;s see if you&#039;re right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheShadowKnows</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/revisiting-the-candidates-for-impending-layoffs/#comment-1290</link>
		<dc:creator>TheShadowKnows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2825#comment-1290</guid>
		<description>It has taken a bit longer than anticipated but layoffs are again pending at Akin Gump for the week of September 21st this is a known fact. My guess is September 25th will be the day since that seems to be the day they like to drop the hatchette.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has taken a bit longer than anticipated but layoffs are again pending at Akin Gump for the week of September 21st this is a known fact. My guess is September 25th will be the day since that seems to be the day they like to drop the hatchette.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/revisiting-the-candidates-for-impending-layoffs/#comment-1145</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2825#comment-1145</guid>
		<description>And DLA&#039;s second largest office in the US and 3rd largest in the world is the NY office so I would say that could qualify them as the &quot;NY firm&quot; discussed in the original article... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And DLA&#039;s second largest office in the US and 3rd largest in the world is the NY office so I would say that could qualify them as the &quot;NY firm&quot; discussed in the original article&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Lewis</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/revisiting-the-candidates-for-impending-layoffs/#comment-1144</link>
		<dc:creator>M Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2825#comment-1144</guid>
		<description>Weil Gotshal has done more than 2 rounds of layoffs, but that doesn&#039;t mean that they should be eliminated from the speculation of this impending layoff.  The 5 O&#039;Clock Club person may not even be aware of the January 9th layoff of 20 staffers plus all the stealth layoffs of attorneys (perhaps 40 attorneys in January).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weil Gotshal has done more than 2 rounds of layoffs, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that they should be eliminated from the speculation of this impending layoff.  The 5 O&#8217;Clock Club person may not even be aware of the January 9th layoff of 20 staffers plus all the stealth layoffs of attorneys (perhaps 40 attorneys in January).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/revisiting-the-candidates-for-impending-layoffs/#comment-1143</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2825#comment-1143</guid>
		<description>What about DLA?  The US operation (which is totally separate from the rest of the firm) has had two rounds (February and July), it has a large NYC office and was on the Five O&#039;Clock Club client list. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about DLA?  The US operation (which is totally separate from the rest of the firm) has had two rounds (February and July), it has a large NYC office and was on the Five O&#039;Clock Club client list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawshucks</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/revisiting-the-candidates-for-impending-layoffs/#comment-1142</link>
		<dc:creator>lawshucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2825#comment-1142</guid>
		<description>What about them?  One round in March, not based in NY... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about them?  One round in March, not based in NY&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/revisiting-the-candidates-for-impending-layoffs/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 06:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2825#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>what about arent fox? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about arent fox?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawshucks</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/revisiting-the-candidates-for-impending-layoffs/#comment-1137</link>
		<dc:creator>lawshucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2825#comment-1137</guid>
		<description>They&#039;ve had three rounds in the past twelve months - when we went to that instead of calendar year, we picked up a layoff of 33 lawyers in November.  They&#039;re a pretty good contender, though.  One of the surprisingly good anecdotal indicators we have is the logs of the search terms that bring people to the site.  Mayer Brown is trending upwards. 
 
Of course, tips are better, so send them in! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#039;ve had three rounds in the past twelve months &#8211; when we went to that instead of calendar year, we picked up a layoff of 33 lawyers in November.  They&#039;re a pretty good contender, though.  One of the surprisingly good anecdotal indicators we have is the logs of the search terms that bring people to the site.  Mayer Brown is trending upwards. </p>
<p>Of course, tips are better, so send them in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawshucks</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/revisiting-the-candidates-for-impending-layoffs/#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator>lawshucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2825#comment-1136</guid>
		<description>OK, now that&#039;s a fair point, but it certainly wasn&#039;t clear from the way you wrote it the first time.  We&#039;re taking the May layoff off the tracker. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, now that&#039;s a fair point, but it certainly wasn&#039;t clear from the way you wrote it the first time.  We&#039;re taking the May layoff off the tracker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twoJ</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/08/revisiting-the-candidates-for-impending-layoffs/#comment-1134</link>
		<dc:creator>twoJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=2825#comment-1134</guid>
		<description>2nd Proskauer, with the news of them backing out of a tentaive lease agreemenet for new office space reported by Bloomberg via ATL </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2nd Proskauer, with the news of them backing out of a tentaive lease agreemenet for new office space reported by Bloomberg via ATL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
