<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Month in Layoffs &#8211; October 09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawshucks.com/2009/11/the-month-in-layoffs-october-09/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/11/the-month-in-layoffs-october-09/</link>
	<description>A self-deprecating look at life in and after BigLaw</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:14:33 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: unioninlawfirms</title>
		<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/11/the-month-in-layoffs-october-09/#comment-1498</link>
		<dc:creator>unioninlawfirms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawshucks.com/?p=3609#comment-1498</guid>
		<description>I guess the giant Dickstein Shapiro is first on the list for November.  
 
I appreciate that you acknowledge that law firms attempt to be coy about their lay offs.   
Hundred of jobs are eliminated through performance review scams - afterall there are no unions in law firms so it&#039;s a secretary against a multimillionaire attorney with lots of litigation experience.  A paralegal can have several years of outstanding performance reviews and then bam! they have huge &quot;problems&quot; with your performance during the Great Recession.  So he/she ends up &quot;resigning.&quot;   
I know of several additional lay offs not included in these charts but you&#039;re black balled if you talk to the press so no one says anything.   
Thanks for maintaining this.  It&#039;s important.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the giant Dickstein Shapiro is first on the list for November.  </p>
<p>I appreciate that you acknowledge that law firms attempt to be coy about their lay offs.<br />
Hundred of jobs are eliminated through performance review scams &#8211; afterall there are no unions in law firms so it&#039;s a secretary against a multimillionaire attorney with lots of litigation experience.  A paralegal can have several years of outstanding performance reviews and then bam! they have huge &quot;problems&quot; with your performance during the Great Recession.  So he/she ends up &quot;resigning.&quot;<br />
I know of several additional lay offs not included in these charts but you&#039;re black balled if you talk to the press so no one says anything.<br />
Thanks for maintaining this.  It&#039;s important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
